California's Proposition 227 Proposition 227 California Law What Is Proposition 227 Pros of Proposition 227 Proposition 227 Articles Proposition 227 Summary Proposition 227 Legislation Benefits of Proposition 227
| California's Proposition 227 | Proposition 227 California Law | What Is Proposition 227 | Pros of Proposition 227 | Proposition 227 Articles | Proposition 227 Summary | Proposition 227 Legislation | Benefits of Proposition 227 |
| California_Proposition_227_(1998) | Ron_Unz | English_for_Children_(Arizona_Proposition_203,_2000) | Stephen_Krashen | Bilingual_Weekly_News | Bilingual_education | Elementary_and_Secondary_Education_Act | Russell_Weiner | University_of_California,_Berkeley | Pacific_Gas_and_Electric_Company | Removal_of_cannabis_from_Schedule_I_of_the_Controlled_Substances_Act | List_of_Oregon_ballot_measures | San_Francisco_mayoral_election,_1975 | Cover_charge | List_of_Harlequin_Romance_novels | San_Diego_Community_College_District | San_Joaquin_County,_California |
|Elections in California|
According to Ballotpedia, "Proposition 227 changed the way that "Limited English Proficient" (LEP) students are taught in California. Specifically, it
The bill's intention was to educate Limited English Proficiency students in a rapid, one-year program. It was sponsored by Ron Unz, the runner-up candidate in the 1994 Republican gubernatorial primary. The proposition was controversial because of its close proximity to heated political issues including race, immigration, and poverty. The methods of education enacted by the proposition reflect the electorate's support of assimilation over multiculturalism. It passed with a margin of 61% to 39%. Although many still argue today about the effects of the proposition, research on its success is for the most part inconclusive.